Sunday, March 26, 2017

TOW #24 – Abstract



                A couple weeks ago Netflix released a new documentary series titled, Abstract. The series consists of eight episodes, each episode following a famous designer that is well-known in a specific design medium. While not all design mediums are shown in the documentary, the series does give its audience a nice range to explore. From illustration to footwear to cars and then stage, each episode leaves it audience inspired
                The first purpose of the show, I believe, is to inform people of the many different mediums of design and then show how they all have a very similar method to being done while also having special elements that make it unique. Then the second purpose is to inspire their audience at the end of each episode. The first purpose is mostly achieved by the audience and their ability to pick up on the similarities between each design medium since the show never explicitly says that they’re similar. Then the second purpose is achieved through at the end of each episode when each designer leaves with a sort of tip for designing. The tone of the designing tip is pretty motivational and leaves the viewer with a sense of motivation to start designing.
                As a wannabe stage designer, being able to see how someone in the professional world goes about turning an empty stage into a scene out of a movie is really inspiring. At the end of the stage design episode, the designer, Es Devlin, basically tells the audience that most people don’t remember the set design of a show or concert, but rather the message the performer is projecting. She continues by saying that it’s our job as set designers to make the performer stand out so people want to listen to their words. At first I was a little taken back by Devlin’s bluntness but then I kind of felt really inspired to start designing sets. Her message made me feel that I had the power to make someone’s words mean something by creating an image/performance that helped back up the performer’s message.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

TOW #23 Worriers – They/Them/Theirs





                The Worriers are an American pop-punk musical group from Brooklyn, New York. Due to their punk nature most of their songs relate to activism and social issues. In 2015 they came out with an album titled ‘Imaginary Life’. This album was produced by Laura Jane Grace, a popular punk-world figure from the band Against Me! In her band Against Me!, Laura made it her mission to tell the tale of her gender dysphoria in order to help people understand trans identities and her production work with the Worriers is no different.
                One song on the album, is titled ‘They/Them/Theirs’ and tells the story of someone explaining their gender identity. The song begins by defining the gender binary that everyone is familiar with and then in the same verse the singer reveals that they identify with neither end of the spectrum. Then the song continues by going a little bit more in depth with the singer’s gender dysphoria and new sense of identity as gender non-binary.
                The audience that Grace was going for is anyone who is ignorant to the fact that there are more than two genders. Then based off this audience it becomes evident that Grace’s purpose is to inform people of the other gender, with this song specifically tackling the topic of non-binary/agender. Then Grace’s second purpose is to provide an explanation for people who don’t feel like they belong in either gender category on the binary scale. As someone who has recently been struggling with a lot of gender dysphoria, I can safely say that this song put in perspective for me the idea that someone can identify as neither male nor female. The song also helped me realize that other people feel the same way that I do about gender which is pretty reassuring when oftentimes I felt like it was just me.

Sunday, March 12, 2017

TOW #22 - Selling Tickets Using Deductive Reasoning



                These past couple weeks everyone who was a part of the spring musical in any shape or form has been trying to sell their tickets. This is mainly because if members of cast and crew don’t sell all their tickets they’re forced to buy them which means some people will be paying from anywhere between $10 - $300. To try and sell their tickets many members attempted to use deductive reasoning. They chose deductive over inductive because inductive was more factual based and most of them just didn’t feel that it would be as successful.
                The most popular way members tried to sell tickets was by milking the fact that the musical was a children’s show. Their major premise was mostly the fact that musicals were a fun family event that people would enjoy. They used the original movie of The Little Mermaid for most of their minor premise evidence, citing the fact that most children loved the original movie so then in conclusion they would also like the musical version of it. They also tried to persuade people to buy tickets by using the fact that during intermission cast members would be on stage for pictures. For this they often cited the amusement park of Disney World for their minor claim, where they claimed that children enjoyed meeting the characters there so then in conclusion they’re children would also enjoy meeting high school students dressed up as the characters as well.  Some members also tried to use the guilt card as their major premise by saying that family members are required to support other family members in their extracurricular activities. Then the minor for this was that they were members of the company so then in conclusion they’re family members had to buy tickets because they’re required to support them in their interests.
                These forms of deductive reason worked fairly well, mostly everyone was able to sell all their required before the show. Only a few people had to try and scalp them at the door.